head to head · open source

CloakBrowser vs open-dots

CloakBrowser has 31,821 GitHub stars, 2,646 forks, 236 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. open-dots has 4,834 stars, 546 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 558% (31,821 vs 4,834 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; open-dots is written in Python under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, open-dots 11%. open-dots was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CloakBrowser ★ 32K open-dots ★ 4.8K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CloakBrowser open-dots
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 4.8K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-29 2026-09-30
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 546
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CloakBrowser if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CloakBrowser profile →

pick open-dots if

  • You want the open-dots feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and open-dots fits your workflow better

full open-dots profile →

About CloakBrowser

CloakBrowser is a stealth Chromium build for Python and JavaScript teams that need browser automation to survive bot detection systems, aimed at scraping and AI agent engineers who want to replace Playwright or Puppeteer without rewriting their code.

read the full CloakBrowser overview →

About open-dots

Open Dots is a self hosted, MIT licensed AI workspace for developers and individuals who want chat, tool use, approval workflows, connectors and an optional computer runtime to run locally under their own control, positioned as an open source alternative to OpenAI Dots.

read the full open-dots overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 117K Mermaid ★ 90K Scrapling ★ 85K Crawl4AI ★ 85K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

CloakBrowser vs Browser Use CloakBrowser vs Scrapling CloakBrowser vs Crawl4AI CloakBrowser vs scrapy CloakBrowser vs EasySpider CloakBrowser vs Lightpanda CloakBrowser vs changedetection.io CloakBrowser vs lux CloakBrowser vs Scrapegraph-ai CloakBrowser vs page-agent CloakBrowser vs ArchiveBox CloakBrowser vs crawlee

Frequently asked questions

Is CloakBrowser or open-dots more popular?

CloakBrowser has 31,821 GitHub stars and open-dots has 4,834. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.

Are CloakBrowser and open-dots free?

Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and open-dots under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CloakBrowser and open-dots?

CloakBrowser is written in Python and open-dots in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or open-dots?

Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (31,821 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose open-dots if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.