head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs open-dots
CloakBrowser has 32,892 GitHub stars, 2,730 forks, 167 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. open-dots has 7,074 stars, 920 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 365% (32,892 vs 7,074 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; open-dots is written in Python under Apache-2.0. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, open-dots 13%. open-dots was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | open-dots | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 7.1K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-12 | 2026-11-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 920 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick open-dots if
- You want the open-dots feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and open-dots fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About open-dots
Open Dots: Open Source Alternative to OpenAI Dots ▶ Watch: OpenAI Dots Alternative: Free, Open Source & Any Model Open Dots is an open source alternative to OpenAI Dots: a self hosted AI workspace for chat, tool use, approvals, connectors, and computer tasks. It brings model conversations, a governed action gateway, approval prompts, and an optional isolated browser runtime into one local first app. Open Dots is independently built and is not affiliated with or endorsed by OpenAI, xAI, or any model provider. It offers a self hostable, inspectable alternative for people looking for an open source OpenAI Dots…
read the full open-dots overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or open-dots more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,892 GitHub stars and open-dots has 7,074. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and open-dots free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and open-dots under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and open-dots?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and open-dots in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or open-dots?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,892 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose open-dots if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.