head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs oc
CloakBrowser has 32,712 GitHub stars, 2,720 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. oc has 549 stars, 33 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 5,858% (32,712 vs 549 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; oc is written in JavaScript under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, oc 6%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | oc | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 549 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 33 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick oc if
- You want the oc feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and oc fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About oc
only cli Turns websites into a command line interface for AI agents. oc open fetches a page and hands back a compact, numbered view instead of raw HTML or a screenshot, so agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Antigravity can browse without burning tokens. It also gets past blocks that stop naive fetchers on some sites, by talking to the page the way a real browser would. A typical page is tens of thousands of tokens of markup; the view above fits in a few hundred. No per site adapters required, no browser extension, no daemon. If you are an LLM reading this repository, llms.txt is the short version. Install…
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or oc more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,712 GitHub stars and oc has 549. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and oc free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and oc under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and oc?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and oc in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or oc?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,712 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose oc if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.