head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs ketch
CloakBrowser has 32,712 GitHub stars, 2,720 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ketch has 740 stars, 44 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 4,321% (32,712 vs 740 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; ketch is written in Go under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, ketch 6%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | ketch | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 740 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 44 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ketch if
- You want the ketch feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and ketch fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About ketch
ketch A stateless CLI for web search, code search, library docs, and scraping — one binary, no daemon, no API server to run. Why ketch Most research tooling for agents means wiring up several provider SDKs, each with its own auth and response shape. ketch collapses that into one binary with three research surfaces: ketch search — web search, no API key required (Brave, DuckDuckGo, SearXNG, Exa, Firecrawl, Keenable, Tavily, Parallel, SerpBase, Serply, or You.com) ketch code — grep real OSS source across public repos (Grep, Sourcegraph, or GitHub Code Search) ketch docs — curated, version aware library…
read the full ketch overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or ketch more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,712 GitHub stars and ketch has 740. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and ketch free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and ketch under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and ketch?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and ketch in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or ketch?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,712 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ketch if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.