head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs jshookmcp
CloakBrowser has 32,885 GitHub stars, 2,730 forks, 166 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. jshookmcp has 2,113 stars, 465 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 1,456% (32,885 vs 2,113 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; jshookmcp is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, jshookmcp 22%. jshookmcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | jshookmcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 2.1K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-12 | 2026-11-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 465 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick jshookmcp if
- You want the jshookmcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and jshookmcp fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About jshookmcp
@jshookmcp/jshook A search first, profile aware reverse engineering workspace for AI agents. Hook the page, capture the network, deobfuscate the bundle, disassemble the WASM, instrument the process — and let one MCP server keep the whole attack surface in reach without drowning the model in schemas. English · 中文 What's different · Capabilities · Use cases · Highlights · Transport · Registry · Architecture · Build Documentation · Getting Started · Configuration · Tool Reference Sponsored by Swiftproxy — Premium Residential Proxies for Web Automation · 10% off code: PROXY90 What makes jshook different Most MCP…
read the full jshookmcp overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or jshookmcp more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,885 GitHub stars and jshookmcp has 2,113. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and jshookmcp free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and jshookmcp under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and jshookmcp?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and jshookmcp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or jshookmcp?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,885 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose jshookmcp if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.