head to head · open source

CloakBrowser vs js-reverse-mcp

CloakBrowser has 32,843 GitHub stars, 2,728 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped yesterday. js-reverse-mcp has 3,064 stars, 399 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 972% (32,843 vs 3,064 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; js-reverse-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, js-reverse-mcp 13%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CloakBrowser ★ 33K js-reverse-mcp ★ 3.1K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CloakBrowser js-reverse-mcp
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 3.1K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-11 2026-09-03
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 399
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CloakBrowser if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CloakBrowser profile →

pick js-reverse-mcp if

  • You want the js-reverse-mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and js-reverse-mcp fits your workflow better

full js-reverse-mcp profile →

About CloakBrowser

Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…

read the full CloakBrowser overview →

About js-reverse-mcp

JS Reverse MCP English 中文 AI first / AI native 的 JavaScript 逆向工程 MCP Server,让你的 AI 编码助手(如 Claude、Cursor、Copilot)能够像分析师一样持续调试、定位、保存和复盘网页中的 JavaScript 行为。 它不是把 Chrome DevTools API 原样搬给模型,而是把脚本、断点、网络、WebSocket、浏览器状态和本地文件 I/O 重新组织成适合 AI Agent 连续推理和操作的工具。反检测是其中一部分能力:默认使用为本 MCP 重新编译发布、独立维护的 Patchright fork 提供协议层 stealth,对强反爬站点可选启用 CloakBrowser 源码层指纹模式。 ☁️ 赞助 · Sponsored by IPWO IPWO 住宅代理支持灵活的代理配置,开发者可以根据不同任务选择相应的网络环境,用于网页访问、请求测试、地区化内容分析及自动化工作流。 对于涉及 JS 逆向、浏览器调试和 Web 网络分析的项目,住宅代理也可以作为网络环境的一种补充选择,帮助开发者更灵活地满足不同地区的访问与测试需求。 👉 免费测试入口,9 折优惠码: 0204 ☁️ 赞助 · Sponsored by Infistar.cc 无限星河 js reverse mcp × Infistar.cc 无限星河|全模型…

read the full js-reverse-mcp overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is CloakBrowser or js-reverse-mcp more popular?

CloakBrowser has 32,843 GitHub stars and js-reverse-mcp has 3,064. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.

Are CloakBrowser and js-reverse-mcp free?

Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and js-reverse-mcp under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CloakBrowser and js-reverse-mcp?

CloakBrowser is written in Python and js-reverse-mcp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or js-reverse-mcp?

Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,843 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose js-reverse-mcp if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.