head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs freeproxy
CloakBrowser has 32,726 GitHub stars, 2,720 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. freeproxy has 579 stars, 102 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 5,552% (32,726 vs 579 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; freeproxy is written in Python under Apache-2.0. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, freeproxy 18%. freeproxy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | freeproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 579 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 102 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick freeproxy if
- You want the freeproxy feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and freeproxy fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About freeproxy
📚 Documentation ⚡ Live Proxies (最新免费高质量代理) 学习收获更多有趣的内容, 欢迎关注微信公众号：Charles的皮卡丘 ✨ What's New 2026 09 16: Released pyfreeproxy v0.5.2 — Perform monthly code maintenance, removed TrustyTechProxiedSession , added HProxyProxiedSession , fixed several proxy sources, and improved IDE hints. 2026 08 03: Released pyfreeproxy v0.5.1 — Perform monthly code maintenance, fix the ProxyShare and ProxyVerity proxy sources, and add ProxyLister and LitPort as new proxy sources. 2026 07 13: Released pyfreeproxy v0.5.0 — Regularly check whether all proxy sources are still functional, fix three invalid proxy sources, and add three…
read the full freeproxy overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or freeproxy more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,726 GitHub stars and freeproxy has 579. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and freeproxy free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and freeproxy under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and freeproxy?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and freeproxy in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or freeproxy?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,726 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose freeproxy if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.