head to head · open source

CloakBrowser vs finvizfinance

CloakBrowser has 31,578 GitHub stars, 2,615 forks, 227 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. finvizfinance has 1,706 stars, 280 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 22 days ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 1,751% (31,578 vs 1,706 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; finvizfinance is written in Python under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, finvizfinance 16%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CloakBrowser ★ 32K finvizfinance ★ 1.7K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CloakBrowser finvizfinance
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 1.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-29
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 280
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CloakBrowser if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CloakBrowser profile →

pick finvizfinance if

  • You want the finvizfinance feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and finvizfinance fits your workflow better

full finvizfinance profile →

About CloakBrowser

CloakBrowser is a stealth Chromium build for Python and JavaScript teams that need browser automation to survive bot detection systems, aimed at scraping and AI agent engineers who want to replace Playwright or Puppeteer without rewriting their code.

read the full CloakBrowser overview →

About finvizfinance

finvizfinance is an MIT licensed Python library that scrapes the FinViz website to deliver stock, forex, and crypto data as pandas dataframes, made for analysts, quants, and developers who want programmatic access to FinViz screens, fundamentals, and news instead of reading the site by hand.

read the full finvizfinance overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

CloakBrowser vs Browser Use CloakBrowser vs Crawl4AI CloakBrowser vs Scrapling CloakBrowser vs scrapy CloakBrowser vs EasySpider CloakBrowser vs Lightpanda CloakBrowser vs changedetection.io CloakBrowser vs lux CloakBrowser vs Scrapegraph-ai CloakBrowser vs crawlee CloakBrowser vs colly CloakBrowser vs stagehand

Frequently asked questions

Is CloakBrowser or finvizfinance more popular?

CloakBrowser has 31,578 GitHub stars and finvizfinance has 1,706. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.

Are CloakBrowser and finvizfinance free?

Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and finvizfinance under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CloakBrowser and finvizfinance?

CloakBrowser is written in Python and finvizfinance in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or finvizfinance?

Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (31,578 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose finvizfinance if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.