head to head · open source

CloakBrowser vs ferret

CloakBrowser has 31,578 GitHub stars, 2,615 forks, 227 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ferret has 6,013 stars, 324 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 425% (31,578 vs 6,013 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; ferret is written in Go under Apache-2.0. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, ferret 5%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CloakBrowser ★ 32K ferret ★ 6.0K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CloakBrowser ferret
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 6.0K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 324
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CloakBrowser if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CloakBrowser profile →

pick ferret if

  • You want the ferret feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and ferret fits your workflow better

full ferret profile →

About CloakBrowser

CloakBrowser is a stealth Chromium build for Python and JavaScript teams that need browser automation to survive bot detection systems, aimed at scraping and AI agent engineers who want to replace Playwright or Puppeteer without rewriting their code.

read the full CloakBrowser overview →

About ferret

Ferret is a declarative data automation language and embeddable Go runtime for structured extraction workflows, built for Go developers who need to query, transform, and synchronize structured data across browsers, APIs, databases, and documents from inside their own applications.

read the full ferret overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

CloakBrowser vs Browser Use CloakBrowser vs Crawl4AI CloakBrowser vs Scrapling CloakBrowser vs scrapy CloakBrowser vs EasySpider CloakBrowser vs Lightpanda CloakBrowser vs changedetection.io CloakBrowser vs lux CloakBrowser vs Scrapegraph-ai CloakBrowser vs crawlee CloakBrowser vs colly CloakBrowser vs stagehand

Frequently asked questions

Is CloakBrowser or ferret more popular?

CloakBrowser has 31,578 GitHub stars and ferret has 6,013. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.

Are CloakBrowser and ferret free?

Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and ferret under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CloakBrowser and ferret?

CloakBrowser is written in Python and ferret in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or ferret?

Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (31,578 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ferret if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.