head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs deepcrawl
CloakBrowser has 32,712 GitHub stars, 2,720 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. deepcrawl has 696 stars, 82 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 4,600% (32,712 vs 696 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; deepcrawl is written in TypeScript under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, deepcrawl 12%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | deepcrawl | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 696 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-08-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 82 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick deepcrawl if
- You want the deepcrawl feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and deepcrawl fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About deepcrawl
Deepcrawl WARNING: DO NOT USE DEEPCRAWL IN PRODUCTION RIGHT NOW AS IT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND STILL UNDER RAPID DEVELOPMENT. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK! 100% free and open source Firecrawl alternative with better performance and flexibility. Ask DeepWiki about this repo NOTE: DeepCrawl doesn’t target anti scraping or anti bot purposes. It’s optimized for high‑frequency agent workloads that scrape public pages to extract cleaned Markdown and a hierarchical links tree. Deepcrawl is an agent oriented website data context extraction platform. It extracts cleaned markdown of page content, agent favoured hierarchical links…
read the full deepcrawl overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or deepcrawl more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,712 GitHub stars and deepcrawl has 696. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and deepcrawl free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and deepcrawl under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and deepcrawl?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and deepcrawl in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or deepcrawl?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,712 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose deepcrawl if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.