head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs atomic-agent
CloakBrowser has 32,863 GitHub stars, 2,727 forks, 165 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. atomic-agent has 3,631 stars, 294 forks, 163 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 805% (32,863 vs 3,631 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; atomic-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, atomic-agent 8%. atomic-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | atomic-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 3.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-11 | 2026-11-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 294 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick atomic-agent if
- You want the atomic-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and atomic-agent fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About atomic-agent
Atomic Agent A local first AI agent that runs on your machine, with local or cloud models. Drives your browser, edits files, runs approved commands, and remembers context across sessions. Open source, running on our TurboQuant llama.cpp so long sessions with small local models fit in less memory. Quick Install · Uninstall · Benchmarks · Why Local First · Ways to Use It · Docs A local first AI agent that runs the control loop and all state on your machine. It works across your machine: browse the web, read and edit files, run approved shell commands, inspect documents, remember context across sessions, schedule…
read the full atomic-agent overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or atomic-agent more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,863 GitHub stars and atomic-agent has 3,631. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and atomic-agent free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and atomic-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and atomic-agent?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and atomic-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or atomic-agent?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,863 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose atomic-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.