head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs atomic-agent
CloakBrowser has 31,738 GitHub stars, 2,642 forks, 236 open issues and last shipped yesterday. atomic-agent has 2,514 stars, 252 forks, 47 open issues and last shipped today. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 1,162% (31,738 vs 2,514 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; atomic-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, atomic-agent 10%. atomic-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | atomic-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 2.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-27 | 2026-09-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 252 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick atomic-agent if
- You want the atomic-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and atomic-agent fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
CloakBrowser is a stealth Chromium build for Python and JavaScript teams that need browser automation to survive bot detection systems, aimed at scraping and AI agent engineers who want to replace Playwright or Puppeteer without rewriting their code.
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About atomic-agent
Atomic Agent is a local first AI agent, written in TypeScript and released under the MIT licence, that runs open weight models and its entire control loop on the user's own machine through llama.cpp, aimed at developers and technical users who want a browser driving, file editing, command running assistant without cloud dependency or per token fees.
read the full atomic-agent overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or atomic-agent more popular?
CloakBrowser has 31,738 GitHub stars and atomic-agent has 2,514. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and atomic-agent free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and atomic-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and atomic-agent?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and atomic-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or atomic-agent?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (31,738 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose atomic-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.