head to head · open source

CloakBrowser vs agentql

CloakBrowser has 32,726 GitHub stars, 2,720 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. agentql has 1,496 stars, 180 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 2,088% (32,726 vs 1,496 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; agentql is written in Python under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, agentql 12%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CloakBrowser ★ 33K agentql ★ 1.5K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CloakBrowser agentql
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 1.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-11-03 2026-11-03
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 180
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CloakBrowser if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CloakBrowser profile →

pick agentql if

  • You want the agentql feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and agentql fits your workflow better

full agentql profile →

About CloakBrowser

Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…

read the full CloakBrowser overview →

About agentql

AgentQL connects LLMs and AI agents to the entire web What is AgentQL? AgentQL is a suite of tools for extracting data and automating workflows on live web sites featuring an AI powered query language, Python and JavaScript SDKs, a browser based debugger, and a REST API endpoint. It uses natural language queries to pinpoint data and elements on any web page, including authenticated and dynamically generated content. Users can define structured data output and apply transforms within queries. AgentQL's natural language selectors find elements intuitively based on the content of the web page and work across…

read the full agentql overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is CloakBrowser or agentql more popular?

CloakBrowser has 32,726 GitHub stars and agentql has 1,496. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.

Are CloakBrowser and agentql free?

Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and agentql under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CloakBrowser and agentql?

CloakBrowser is written in Python and agentql in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or agentql?

Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,726 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose agentql if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.