head to head · open source

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Swetrix

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars, 464 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Swetrix has 1,211 stars, 78 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor leads on adoption by 626% (8,789 vs 1,211 stars). Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python under MIT; Swetrix is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Swetrix 6%. Swetrix was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor ★ 8.8K Swetrix ★ 1.2K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor Swetrix
GitHub stars ★ 8.8K ★ 1.2K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-07-05 2026-11-03
Forks ⑂ 464 ⑂ 78
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if

  • You weight community size — 8.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor profile →

pick Swetrix if

  • You want the Swetrix feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Swetrix fits your workflow better

full Swetrix profile →

About Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor

🎯 Claude Code Usage Monitor A privacy first Claude Usage Ops companion for Claude Code. It combines a Rich live terminal monitor with official statusline rate limits , machine readable state/export output, provenance labels, forecasting, and an opt in local usage warehouse. 📑 Table of Contents ✨ Key Features 🚀 Installation ⚡ Modern Installation with uv (Recommended) 📦 Installation with pip 🛠️ Other Package Managers 📖 Usage Get Help Basic Usage Configuration Options Available Plans 🙏 Please Help Test This Release! ✨ Features & How It Works Current Features Understanding Claude Sessions Token Limits by Plan…

read the full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor overview →

About Swetrix

Swetrix Privacy first, open source web analytics — with error tracking, session replays and performance monitoring built in. See the live demo » Website · Docs · Issues · Discord · Twitter ℹ️ What is Swetrix? Swetrix is a cookieless, GDPR compliant analytics platform — a privacy respecting alternative to Google Analytics. No cookies, no consent banner, no cross device tracking, all data anonymised. It's the only thing on the page and the dashboard is fast and real time. It goes beyond pageviews: alongside traffic stats you get error tracking , performance monitoring , session replays , funnels and custom events…

read the full Swetrix overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Web & Product Analytics projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Swetrix more popular?

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars and Swetrix has 1,211. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Swetrix free?

Both are open source. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is licensed under MIT and Swetrix under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Swetrix?

Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python and Swetrix in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Swetrix?

Choose Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if you want the larger community (8,789 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Swetrix if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.