head to head · open source
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs Betterlytics
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars, 464 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Betterlytics has 180 stars, 21 forks, 55 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor leads on adoption by 4,783% (8,789 vs 180 stars). Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python under MIT; Betterlytics is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Betterlytics 12%. Betterlytics was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor | Betterlytics | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.8K | ★ 180 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-07-05 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 464 | ⑂ 21 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if
- You weight community size — 8.8K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Betterlytics if
- You want the Betterlytics feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Betterlytics fits your workflow better
About Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor
🎯 Claude Code Usage Monitor A privacy first Claude Usage Ops companion for Claude Code. It combines a Rich live terminal monitor with official statusline rate limits , machine readable state/export output, provenance labels, forecasting, and an opt in local usage warehouse. 📑 Table of Contents ✨ Key Features 🚀 Installation ⚡ Modern Installation with uv (Recommended) 📦 Installation with pip 🛠️ Other Package Managers 📖 Usage Get Help Basic Usage Configuration Options Available Plans 🙏 Please Help Test This Release! ✨ Features & How It Works Current Features Understanding Claude Sessions Token Limits by Plan…
read the full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor overview →
About Betterlytics
A modern take on cookieless, privacy focused web analytics Website Demo Docs Features Contribute Why Betterlytics? Betterlytics is a high performance analytics platform that puts you in control of your data. It requires no cookies, is GDPR/CCPA/PECR ready out of the box, and never shares data with third parties. Built on Rust and ClickHouse for speed, it delivers real time insights through a modern dashboard, all with a tracking script under 2KB. Want to see it in action? Explore the live demo. Features Developer Experience Simple script tag, framework SDKs (React, Next.js), self hosting option, Overview…
read the full Betterlytics overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Web & Product Analytics projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Betterlytics more popular?
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars and Betterlytics has 180. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Betterlytics free?
Both are open source. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is licensed under MIT and Betterlytics under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and Betterlytics?
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python and Betterlytics in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or Betterlytics?
Choose Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if you want the larger community (8,789 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Betterlytics if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.