head to head · open source
checkov vs TeamPass
checkov has 9,117 GitHub stars, 1,451 forks, 170 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. TeamPass has 1,870 stars, 571 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. checkov leads on adoption by 388% (9,117 vs 1,870 stars). checkov is written in Python under Apache-2.0; TeamPass is written in PHP under GPL-3.0. checkov has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, TeamPass 31%. TeamPass was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (compliance), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| checkov | TeamPass | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.1K | ★ 1.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-10-26 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.5K | ⑂ 571 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick checkov if
- You weight community size — 9.1K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick TeamPass if
- You want the TeamPass feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and TeamPass fits your workflow better
About checkov
Checkov is a static code analysis tool for infrastructure as code (IaC) and also a software composition analysis (SCA) tool for images and open source packages. It scans cloud infrastructure provisioned using Terraform, Terraform plan, Cloudformation, AWS SAM, Kubernetes, Helm charts, Kustomize, Dockerfile, Serverless, Bicep, OpenAPI, ARM Templates, or OpenTofu and detects security and compliance misconfigurations using graph based scanning. It performs Software Composition Analysis (SCA) scanning which is a scan of open source packages and images for Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs). Checkov also…
read the full checkov overview →
About TeamPass
Teampass Self hosted password management your whole team can trust Folder level access control · authenticated AES 256 GCM encryption · compliance evidence Your secrets never leave your infrastructure. 🌐 teampass.net · 📖 Documentation · 💬 Discussions · 🐳 Docker Hub Contents About Who it's for Security Features Get started Documentation Languages Community Support Teampass License About Teampass is an open source credential vault you run yourself. No account to create, no company behind the curtain holding your data — just a PHP/MySQL application on your own server, with folder level access control, per user…
read the full TeamPass overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is checkov or TeamPass more popular?
checkov has 9,117 GitHub stars and TeamPass has 1,870. checkov has the larger community by that measure.
Are checkov and TeamPass free?
Both are open source. checkov is licensed under Apache-2.0 and TeamPass under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between checkov and TeamPass?
checkov is written in Python and TeamPass in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, checkov or TeamPass?
Choose checkov if you want the larger community (9,117 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose TeamPass if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.