head to head · open source
caveman vs Omnigent
caveman has 116,900 GitHub stars, 6,789 forks, 155 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Omnigent has 11,175 stars, 1,841 forks, 1,315 open issues and last shipped yesterday. caveman leads on adoption by 946% (116,900 vs 11,175 stars). caveman is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Omnigent is written in Python under Apache-2.0. caveman has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Omnigent 16%. Omnigent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai, claude-code, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| caveman | Omnigent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 117K | ★ 11K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.8K | ⑂ 1.8K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick caveman if
- You weight community size — 117K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Omnigent if
- You want the Omnigent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Omnigent fits your workflow better
About caveman
why use many token when few do trick Your AI coding agent bills by the word and writes like it knows that. Caveman make it stop. ▶️ ThePrimeagen reacts: "No way this actually works" 🏆 1 on GitHub Trending · July 2026 · 🥇 1 Repository of the Day on Trendshift · April 2026 1 on Hacker News · 904 points · 366 comments · 8 Product of the Day on Product Hunt 📄 Cited in CAVEWOMAN , an Adobe Research paper that measured caveman style output cutting cost 1.4 to 2.4×, up to 3× · 🧪 Tested by JetBrains on 86 real coding tasks: "costs you nothing measurable in quality" ⚡ One command, no account, no API key. npx skills…
read the full caveman overview →
About Omnigent
Omnigent The open source meta harness for all your AI agents. Omnigent is an open source meta harness that gives you a common orchestration layer over Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Hermes, Pi, and the agents you write yourself: swap or combine harnesses without rewriting, enforce policies and sandboxing, and collaborate in real time from any device — terminal, browser, phone, or the native desktop app. omnigent.ai · ⬇️ Download the macOS desktop app Why Omnigent? Omnigent lets you: 📱 Work with agents from any device, including your phone. Sessions follow you: start in your terminal, continue in the…
read the full Omnigent overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More AI Assisted Coding projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.
Frequently asked questions
Is caveman or Omnigent more popular?
caveman has 116,900 GitHub stars and Omnigent has 11,175. caveman has the larger community by that measure.
Are caveman and Omnigent free?
Both are open source. caveman is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Omnigent under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between caveman and Omnigent?
caveman is written in Go and Omnigent in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, caveman or Omnigent?
Choose caveman if you want the larger community (116,900 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Omnigent if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.