head to head · open source

cadence vs Ethora

cadence has 9,446 GitHub stars, 915 forks, 205 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Ethora has 546 stars, 111 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cadence leads on adoption by 1,630% (9,446 vs 546 stars). cadence is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Ethora is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. cadence has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Ethora 20%. cadence was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cadence ★ 9.4K Ethora ★ 546 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cadence Ethora
GitHub stars ★ 9.4K ★ 546
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 915 ⑂ 111
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cadence if

  • You weight community size — 9.4K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cadence profile →

pick Ethora if

  • You want the Ethora feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Ethora fits your workflow better

full Ethora profile →

About cadence

Cadence is an open source orchestration engine for running asynchronous, long running business logic in a fault tolerant way. Written in Go under the Apache 2.0 license, it lives in the distributed systems and workflow automation space, and the project has been open source since 2017. This repository holds the core engine plus supporting tools: the CLI, schema management, a benchmark suite, and a canary. Client libraries for Go and Java are official, while Python and Ruby SDKs come from the community, and iWF can be layered on top as a DSL framework.

read the full cadence overview →

About Ethora

Ethora is an Apache 2.0 licensed chat, AI and messaging SDK monorepo that adds real time messaging, prebuilt chat UI, bots and backend services to web, iOS and Android applications, and it is aimed at product teams that would rather integrate a messaging layer than assemble one.

read the full Ethora overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

cadence vs n8n cadence vs ProxmoxVE cadence vs ActivePieces cadence vs LiveKit cadence vs amis cadence vs Windmill cadence vs Botpress cadence vs mitosis cadence vs Automatisch cadence vs puck cadence vs Typebot cadence vs local-deep-research

Frequently asked questions

Is cadence or Ethora more popular?

cadence has 9,446 GitHub stars and Ethora has 546. cadence has the larger community by that measure.

Are cadence and Ethora free?

Both are open source. cadence is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Ethora under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cadence and Ethora?

cadence is written in Go and Ethora in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cadence or Ethora?

Choose cadence if you want the larger community (9,446 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Ethora if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.