head to head · open source

Botpress vs cadence

Botpress has 14,920 GitHub stars, 2,293 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cadence has 9,446 stars, 915 forks, 205 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Botpress leads on adoption by 58% (14,920 vs 9,446 stars). Botpress is written in TypeScript under MIT; cadence is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Botpress has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, cadence 10%. Botpress was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Botpress ★ 15K cadence ★ 9.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Botpress cadence
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 9.4K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 915
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Botpress if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Botpress profile →

pick cadence if

  • You want the cadence feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and cadence fits your workflow better

full cadence profile →

About Botpress

Botpress is open source hub to build and deploy GPT/LLM agents. It lives in Botpress Cloud ecosystem. Project uses TypeScript, MIT license, npm packages @botpress/cli and @botpress/sdk. Repository contains public integrations, devtools, example bots as code, and plugins for Botpress Studio, marked coming soon.

read the full Botpress overview →

About cadence

Cadence is an open source orchestration engine for running asynchronous, long running business logic in a fault tolerant way. Written in Go under the Apache 2.0 license, it lives in the distributed systems and workflow automation space, and the project has been open source since 2017. This repository holds the core engine plus supporting tools: the CLI, schema management, a benchmark suite, and a canary. Client libraries for Go and Java are official, while Python and Ruby SDKs come from the community, and iWF can be layered on top as a DSL framework.

read the full cadence overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

Botpress vs n8n Botpress vs ProxmoxVE Botpress vs ActivePieces Botpress vs LiveKit Botpress vs amis Botpress vs Windmill Botpress vs mitosis Botpress vs Automatisch Botpress vs puck Botpress vs Typebot Botpress vs local-deep-research Botpress vs teslamate

Frequently asked questions

Is Botpress or cadence more popular?

Botpress has 14,920 GitHub stars and cadence has 9,446. Botpress has the larger community by that measure.

Are Botpress and cadence free?

Both are open source. Botpress is licensed under MIT and cadence under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Botpress and cadence?

Botpress is written in TypeScript and cadence in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Botpress or cadence?

Choose Botpress if you want the larger community (14,920 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cadence if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.