head to head · open source
Browser Use vs reader
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars, 13,371 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. reader has 561 stars, 41 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 21,286% (119,977 vs 561 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; reader is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, reader 7%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-agents, headless-browser, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | reader | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 561 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 41 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick reader if
- You want the reader feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and reader fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About reader
Reader Open source web infrastructure for AI. Access the web without the complexity. Docs · Examples · Discord The Problem Building agents that need web access is frustrating. You piece together Puppeteer, add stealth plugins, fight Cloudflare, manage proxies and it still breaks in production. Because production grade web scraping isn't about rendering a page and converting HTML to markdown. It's about everything underneath: I built Reader , a production grade web scraping engine on top of Playwright, with stealth and anti detection built in from the ground up. The Solution Three primitives. That's it. All the…
read the full reader overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or reader more popular?
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars and reader has 561. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and reader free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and reader under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and reader?
Browser Use is written in Python and reader in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or reader?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,977 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose reader if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.