head to head · open source
Browser Use vs EasySpider
Browser Use has 120,031 GitHub stars, 13,383 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. EasySpider has 44,765 stars, 5,394 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 168% (120,031 vs 44,765 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, EasySpider 12%. EasySpider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | EasySpider | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 45K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 5.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick EasySpider if
- You want the EasySpider feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and EasySpider fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About EasySpider
易采集/EasySpider: Visual Code Free Web Crawler 一个 完全免费 （ 包括商业使用和二次开发 ）的可视化浏览器自动化测试/数据采集/爬虫软件，可以使用图形化界面，无代码可视化的设计和执行任务。只需要在网页上选择自己想要操作的内容并根据提示框操作即可完成任务的设计和执行。同时软件还可以单独以命令行的方式进行执行，从而可以很方便的嵌入到其他系统中。 A completely free (including for commercial use and secondary development) visual browser automation test/data collection/crawler software, which can be used to design and execute tasks in a code free visual way. You only need to select the content you want to operate on the web page and follow the prompts to complete the design and execution of the task. At the same time, the software can also be executed separately in…
read the full EasySpider overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or EasySpider more popular?
Browser Use has 120,031 GitHub stars and EasySpider has 44,765. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and EasySpider free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and EasySpider under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and EasySpider?
Browser Use is written in Python and EasySpider in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or EasySpider?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (120,031 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose EasySpider if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.