head to head · open source
Browser Use vs dots
Browser Use has 121,050 GitHub stars, 13,537 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped today. dots has 32,530 stars, 4,757 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 272% (121,050 vs 32,530 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; dots is written in Python under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, dots 15%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | dots | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 121K | ★ 33K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-15 | 2026-11-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 4.8K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 121K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick dots if
- You want the dots feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and dots fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About dots
dots Every AI agent is a model and a browser. You can swap the model with one flag. The browser is what the website sees. Windows, in PowerShell: Linux: Then open The conversation on the left, the browser on the right, live. It all comes down to the browser When a web agent fails, the model is rarely why. The page never loaded, a challenge appeared, the login expired, the click did not land. All of that happens in the browser, before the model gets to think. So dots is built around one: A real Firefox engine, patched in C++. The fingerprint is decided inside the engine, not painted over with JavaScript that a…
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or dots more popular?
Browser Use has 121,050 GitHub stars and dots has 32,530. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and dots free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and dots under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and dots?
Browser Use is written in Python and dots in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or dots?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (121,050 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose dots if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.