head to head · open source
Browser Use vs ProxmoxVE
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ProxmoxVE has 30,010 stars, 2,938 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 299% (119,857 vs 30,010 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; ProxmoxVE is written in Shell under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, ProxmoxVE 10%. ProxmoxVE was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | ProxmoxVE | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 30K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Shell |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 2.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ProxmoxVE if
- You want the ProxmoxVE feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Shell
- You evaluated both and ProxmoxVE fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About ProxmoxVE
Proxmox VE Helper Scripts One command installations for services, containers, and VMs on Proxmox VE A community project — built on the foundation of @tteck 's original work What is this? Simplify your Proxmox VE setup with community driven automation scripts. Install and configure popular self hosted services with a single command — no manual package hunting, no config file archaeology. Paste a command into your Proxmox shell, answer a few prompts, and your container or VM is up and running. The collection covers hundreds of services across categories like home automation, media servers, networking tools…
read the full ProxmoxVE overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or ProxmoxVE more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and ProxmoxVE has 30,010. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and ProxmoxVE free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and ProxmoxVE under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and ProxmoxVE?
Browser Use is written in Python and ProxmoxVE in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or ProxmoxVE?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ProxmoxVE if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.