head to head · open source
Browser Use vs loopx
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. loopx has 6,537 stars, 619 forks, 102 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 1,734% (119,857 vs 6,537 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; loopx is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, loopx 9%. loopx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | loopx | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 6.5K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 619 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick loopx if
- You want the loopx feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and loopx fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About loopx
LoopX The open, provider neutral, stateful control plane for long horizon agents. Runs on top of Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, and other agent harnesses. LoopX preserves objectives, gates, todos, evidence, quota, and handoffs across turns; the harness executes bounded work. Public website · Blog · Docs · Developer Book · Try LoopX · See real loops · How it works · 简体中文 Open and provider neutral, LoopX is a lightweight state kernel and local first control plane for loop engineering. It runs on top of different agent harnesses rather than replacing them, providing the long horizon state, semantic decisions about…
read the full loopx overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or loopx more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and loopx has 6,537. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and loopx free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and loopx under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and loopx?
Browser Use is written in Python and loopx in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or loopx?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose loopx if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.