head to head · open source
Browser Use vs HTTP-Shortcuts
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. HTTP-Shortcuts has 1,859 stars, 158 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 6,347% (119,857 vs 1,859 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; HTTP-Shortcuts is written in Kotlin under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, HTTP-Shortcuts 8%. HTTP-Shortcuts was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | HTTP-Shortcuts | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 1.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Kotlin |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 158 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick HTTP-Shortcuts if
- You want the HTTP-Shortcuts feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Kotlin
- You evaluated both and HTTP-Shortcuts fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About HTTP-Shortcuts
HTTP Shortcuts for Android An Android app that lets you to create shortcuts that can be placed on your home screen. Each shortcut, when clicked, triggers an HTTP request, with the possibility to process and display the response in various ways. Plus a whole lot of other (non HTTP) stuff. or download the latest APK directly. Find more information and documentation on the official website, or check out the (still very new and sparsely populated) official subreddit. Support this app by helping me translate it or by becoming a Beta Tester! Features No ads, no enshitification (I try) and completely free and open…
read the full HTTP-Shortcuts overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or HTTP-Shortcuts more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and HTTP-Shortcuts has 1,859. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and HTTP-Shortcuts free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and HTTP-Shortcuts under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and HTTP-Shortcuts?
Browser Use is written in Python and HTTP-Shortcuts in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or HTTP-Shortcuts?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose HTTP-Shortcuts if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.