head to head · open source
Browser Use vs home-assistant-vibecode-agent
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. home-assistant-vibecode-agent has 652 stars, 55 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 18,283% (119,857 vs 652 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; home-assistant-vibecode-agent is written in Python under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, home-assistant-vibecode-agent 8%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | home-assistant-vibecode-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 652 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-21 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 55 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick home-assistant-vibecode-agent if
- You want the home-assistant-vibecode-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and home-assistant-vibecode-agent fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About home-assistant-vibecode-agent
HA Vibecode Agent Let AI build your Home Assistant automations – or act as your DevOps for the ones you write by hand. Just describe what you need in natural language. 🏠🤖 You describe your goal → AI inspects your Home Assistant → designs a custom solution → and deploys it on board automatically. 🚀 And if you prefer to handcraft your automations and scripts yourself, the agent can simply act as your DevOps and extra pair of hands: quickly uploading your changes, running tests, and analyzing logs on demand. You stay in control and decide how much you delegate to AI and how deep it should go. Transform the way…
read the full home-assistant-vibecode-agent overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or home-assistant-vibecode-agent more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and home-assistant-vibecode-agent has 652. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and home-assistant-vibecode-agent free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and home-assistant-vibecode-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and home-assistant-vibecode-agent?
Browser Use is written in Python and home-assistant-vibecode-agent in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or home-assistant-vibecode-agent?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose home-assistant-vibecode-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.