head to head · open source
Browser Use vs gpt-home
Browser Use has 115,022 GitHub stars, 12,661 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. gpt-home has 649 stars, 68 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 17,623% (115,022 vs 649 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; gpt-home is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, gpt-home 10%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | gpt-home | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 115K | ★ 649 |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 68 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 115K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gpt-home if
- You want the gpt-home feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and gpt-home fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Browser Use is an open source Python library and hosted platform that enables AI agents to control web browsers programmatically. It lives in the AI agent and browser automation ecosystem, built on Playwright and designed to let LLMs interact with websites as a human would—clicking, filling forms, solving CAPTCHAs, and navigating dynamic interfaces. The project provides three deployment paths: a fully hosted cloud service, a command line interface for existing agents, and a local Python library for custom integrations.
read the full Browser Use overview →
About gpt-home
🏠 GPT Home 🤖💬 ChatGPT at home! Basically a better Google Nest Hub or Amazon Alexa home assistant. Built on the Raspberry P iusing LiteLLM and LangGraph. This guide will explain how to build your own. It's pretty straight forward. You can also use this as a reference for building other projects on the Raspberry Pi. Theoretically, the app should run on any linux system thanks to docker, but I can only vouch for the versions listed in the compatibility table. You should be able use any plug and play USB/3.5mm speaker or microphone as long as it's supported by ALSA or PortAudio. 📦 Integrations ✅ OpenAI ✅ Spotify …
read the full gpt-home overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or gpt-home more popular?
Browser Use has 115,022 GitHub stars and gpt-home has 649. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and gpt-home free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and gpt-home under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and gpt-home?
Browser Use is written in Python and gpt-home in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or gpt-home?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (115,022 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gpt-home if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.