head to head · open source
Browser Use vs gpt-home
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gpt-home has 652 stars, 68 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 18,283% (119,857 vs 652 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; gpt-home is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, gpt-home 10%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | gpt-home | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 652 |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 68 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gpt-home if
- You want the gpt-home feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and gpt-home fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About gpt-home
🏠 GPT Home 🤖💬 ChatGPT at home! Basically a better Google Nest Hub or Amazon Alexa home assistant. Built on the Raspberry P iusing LiteLLM and LangGraph. This guide will explain how to build your own. It's pretty straight forward. You can also use this as a reference for building other projects on the Raspberry Pi. Theoretically, the app should run on any linux system thanks to docker, but I can only vouch for the versions listed in the compatibility table. You should be able use any plug and play USB/3.5mm speaker or microphone as long as it's supported by ALSA or PortAudio. 📦 Integrations ✅ OpenAI ✅ Spotify…
read the full gpt-home overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or gpt-home more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and gpt-home has 652. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and gpt-home free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and gpt-home under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and gpt-home?
Browser Use is written in Python and gpt-home in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or gpt-home?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gpt-home if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.