head to head · open source
Browser Use vs flowgram.ai
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. flowgram.ai has 8,551 stars, 783 forks, 110 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 1,302% (119,857 vs 8,551 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; flowgram.ai is written in TypeScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, flowgram.ai 9%. flowgram.ai was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | flowgram.ai | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 8.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 783 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick flowgram.ai if
- You want the flowgram.ai feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and flowgram.ai fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About flowgram.ai
FlowGram｜Workflow development framework English 中文 Español Русский Português Deutsch 日本語 FlowGram is a composable, visual, easy to integrate, and extensible workflow development framework & toolkit. Our goal is to help developers build AI workflow platforms faster and simpler . FlowGram comes with a suite of built in tools for workflow development: flow canvas, node configuration form, variable scope chain, and ready to use materials (LLM, Condition, Code Editor etc). It’s not a ready made workflow platform; it’s the framework and toolkit to build yours. Learn more at FlowGram.AI 🌐 🎬 Demo Open in CodeSandbox…
read the full flowgram.ai overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or flowgram.ai more popular?
Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and flowgram.ai has 8,551. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and flowgram.ai free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and flowgram.ai under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and flowgram.ai?
Browser Use is written in Python and flowgram.ai in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or flowgram.ai?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose flowgram.ai if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.