head to head · open source
Browser Use vs figranium
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars, 13,371 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. figranium has 782 stars, 49 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 15,242% (119,977 vs 782 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; figranium is written in HTML under GPL-3.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, figranium 6%. figranium was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (browser-automation, headless-browser, playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | figranium | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 782 |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 49 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick figranium if
- You want the figranium feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and figranium fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About figranium
Figranium Figranium is an open source, deterministic browser automation platform that lets you build visual browser tasks that can be called as APIs. Create scraping and automation workflows visually, pass dynamic inputs at runtime, and get structured results—without usage credits or third party data hosting. What You Get Block‑based automation — build flows with actions like click, type, wait, hover, and execute JavaScript against modern pages. Task API — trigger saved tasks via HTTP ( /api/tasks/:id/api ), pass variables at runtime, and secure runs with the API key you control. Captures & Cabinets — review…
read the full figranium overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or figranium more popular?
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars and figranium has 782. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and figranium free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and figranium under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and figranium?
Browser Use is written in Python and figranium in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or figranium?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,977 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose figranium if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.