head to head · open source

Browser Use vs ff-ruyijs

Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars, 13,358 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ff-ruyijs has 537 stars, 274 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Browser Use leads on adoption by 22,220% (119,857 vs 537 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; ff-ruyijs is written in C++ under AGPL-3.0. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, ff-ruyijs 51%. ff-ruyijs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (headless-browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Browser Use ★ 120K ff-ruyijs ★ 537 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Browser Use ff-ruyijs
GitHub stars ★ 120K ★ 537
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Python C++
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 274
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Browser Use if

  • You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Browser Use profile →

pick ff-ruyijs if

  • You want the ff-ruyijs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and ff-ruyijs fits your workflow better

full ff-ruyijs profile →

About Browser Use

Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…

read the full Browser Use overview →

About ff-ruyijs

🦊 ruyiJS Run any site's JavaScript from Python — with the real Firefox engine. A new generation, minimalist browser purpose built for AI driven automation. The authentic Firefox JavaScript engine and networking stack, with no window and no renderer — made for web scraping, JS reverse engineering, data collection, and getting past bot checks. Sponsored by Contributors Install · Features · Verification systems · Examples · FAQ · Contact · LinuxDO · English · 简体中文 ⚠️ Disclaimer: This project is for researching next generation AI browsers. Any form of brute force reverse engineering is strictly rejected. The source…

read the full ff-ruyijs overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Browser Use or ff-ruyijs more popular?

Browser Use has 119,857 GitHub stars and ff-ruyijs has 537. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.

Are Browser Use and ff-ruyijs free?

Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and ff-ruyijs under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Browser Use and ff-ruyijs?

Browser Use is written in Python and ff-ruyijs in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Browser Use or ff-ruyijs?

Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,857 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ff-ruyijs if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.