head to head · open source
Browser Use vs BrowserKitten
Browser Use has 120,203 GitHub stars, 13,410 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped yesterday. BrowserKitten has 2,381 stars, 10 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 4,948% (120,203 vs 2,381 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; BrowserKitten is written in JavaScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, BrowserKitten 0%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (browser-agent, browser-automation, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | BrowserKitten | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 2.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-06 | 2026-11-05 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 10 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick BrowserKitten if
- You want the BrowserKitten feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and BrowserKitten fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About BrowserKitten
Browser Kitten An agent for the browser you already use. Read signed in pages, take action, create files, and follow up locally. English · 简体中文 Quick start · Configuration · Documentation · Current limits · Contribute · Issues Browser Kitten is an MIT licensed Chrome MV3 extension with an agent in the side panel. It works with your existing browser session and keeps conversations, workspace files, and follow up tasks on this computer. Model and other provider requests use the services you configure. Current source version: 1.2.0 · Load unpacked · No build step for installation. What you can do See the actual…
read the full BrowserKitten overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or BrowserKitten more popular?
Browser Use has 120,203 GitHub stars and BrowserKitten has 2,381. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and BrowserKitten free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and BrowserKitten under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and BrowserKitten?
Browser Use is written in Python and BrowserKitten in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or BrowserKitten?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (120,203 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose BrowserKitten if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.