head to head · open source
Browser Use vs article-extractor
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars, 13,371 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. article-extractor has 1,913 stars, 157 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 6,172% (119,977 vs 1,913 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; article-extractor is written in TypeScript under MIT. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, article-extractor 8%. Browser Use was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | article-extractor | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 1.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-08-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 157 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick article-extractor if
- You want the article-extractor feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and article-extractor fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About article-extractor
@extractus/article extractor Extract main article, main image and meta data from URL. Install Deno Node.js / Bun Alternatively, install from npm: Usage APIs extract() extractFromHtml() Transformations Transformation object addTransformations() removeTransformations() Priority order Content sanitization options extract() Load and extract article data from a URL or HTML string. Syntax Example: The result can be null (when no article found) or an ArticleData object: Parameters input required URL string or raw HTML content. parserOptions optional fetcher optional A custom fetch function with the signature (url…
read the full article-extractor overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or article-extractor more popular?
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars and article-extractor has 1,913. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and article-extractor free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and article-extractor under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and article-extractor?
Browser Use is written in Python and article-extractor in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or article-extractor?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,977 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose article-extractor if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.