head to head · open source

Brave vs BrowserOS

Brave has 23,676 GitHub stars, 3,216 forks, 10,752 open issues and last shipped yesterday. BrowserOS has 13,718 stars, 1,459 forks, 82 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Brave leads on adoption by 73% (23,676 vs 13,718 stars). Brave is written in various languages under MPL-2.0; BrowserOS is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Brave has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, BrowserOS 11%. Brave was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 5 topic tags (browser, chromium, linux, macos), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Brave ★ 24K BrowserOS ★ 14K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Brave BrowserOS
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 14K
License MPL-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Brave if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Brave profile →

pick BrowserOS if

  • You want the BrowserOS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and BrowserOS fits your workflow better

full BrowserOS profile →

About Brave

Brave is a Chromium based web browser for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS, released under the MPL 2.0 licence, and this repository is the project's public issue tracker, release channel, and developer wiki rather than the home of its source code.

read the full Brave overview →

About BrowserOS

BrowserOS is an open source agentic browser, written in TypeScript under AGPL 3.0, that puts AI agents inside a real Chromium browser on the user's own machine so they can work with real logged in accounts, and it is aimed at people who already use an agent harness such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or any MCP agent and want that agent to handle web tasks instead of a sandbox.

read the full BrowserOS overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

vscode vs monaco-editor browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp playwright vs chrome-devtools-mcp puppeteer vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs ladybird playwright vs obscura ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Brave vs uBlock Brave vs Ladybird Brave vs chrome-devtools-mcp Brave vs monaco-editor Brave vs Zen Browser Brave vs servo Brave vs serenity Brave vs refined-github Brave vs slate Brave vs Avalonia Brave vs webtorrent Brave vs fingerprintjs

Frequently asked questions

Is Brave or BrowserOS more popular?

Brave has 23,676 GitHub stars and BrowserOS has 13,718. Brave has the larger community by that measure.

Are Brave and BrowserOS free?

Both are open source. Brave is licensed under MPL-2.0 and BrowserOS under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Brave and BrowserOS?

Brave is written in various languages and BrowserOS in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Brave or BrowserOS?

Choose Brave if you want the larger community (23,676 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose BrowserOS if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.