head to head · open source

Botpress vs ByteChef

Botpress has 14,920 GitHub stars, 2,293 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ByteChef has 1,004 stars, 170 forks, 455 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Botpress leads on adoption by 1,386% (14,920 vs 1,004 stars). Botpress is written in TypeScript under MIT; ByteChef is written in Java under a custom or non-standard licence. Botpress has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, ByteChef 17%. Botpress was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Botpress ★ 15K ByteChef ★ 1.0K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Botpress ByteChef
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 1.0K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 170
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Botpress if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Botpress profile →

pick ByteChef if

  • You want the ByteChef feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and ByteChef fits your workflow better

full ByteChef profile →

About Botpress

Botpress is open source hub to build and deploy GPT/LLM agents. It lives in Botpress Cloud ecosystem. Project uses TypeScript, MIT license, npm packages @botpress/cli and @botpress/sdk. Repository contains public integrations, devtools, example bots as code, and plugins for Botpress Studio, marked coming soon.

read the full Botpress overview →

About ByteChef

ByteChef is an open source, Java based platform in the Productivity & Utilities / Automation category that unifies AI agent orchestration and workflow automation for developers, low code builders, and enterprises that need both capabilities in one system.

read the full ByteChef overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

Botpress vs n8n Botpress vs ProxmoxVE Botpress vs ActivePieces Botpress vs LiveKit Botpress vs amis Botpress vs Windmill Botpress vs mitosis Botpress vs Automatisch Botpress vs puck Botpress vs Typebot Botpress vs cadence Botpress vs local-deep-research

Frequently asked questions

Is Botpress or ByteChef more popular?

Botpress has 14,920 GitHub stars and ByteChef has 1,004. Botpress has the larger community by that measure.

Are Botpress and ByteChef free?

Both are open source. Botpress is licensed under MIT, and ByteChef has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Botpress and ByteChef?

Botpress is written in TypeScript and ByteChef in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Botpress or ByteChef?

Choose Botpress if you want the larger community (14,920 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ByteChef if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.