head to head · open source

Bluesky vs social

Bluesky has 18,304 GitHub stars, 2,839 forks, 2,400 open issues and last shipped today. social has 503 stars, 59 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Bluesky leads on adoption by 3,539% (18,304 vs 503 stars). Bluesky is written in TypeScript under MIT; social is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0. Bluesky has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, social 12%. Bluesky was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bluesky ★ 18K social ★ 503 category Community & Social

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bluesky social
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 503
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript PHP
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 59
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bluesky if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bluesky profile →

pick social if

  • You want the social feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and social fits your workflow better

full social profile →

About Bluesky

Bluesky is the open source social application codebase for the Bluesky Social app. It lives in the AT Protocol ecosystem, also called atproto, and it is written in TypeScript as a React Native application. The project provides client code for Web, iOS, and Android, and it builds on open source atproto packages such as @atproto/api, which live in a separate repository.

read the full Bluesky overview →

About social

Nextcloud Social is an AGPL 3.0 Nextcloud app that turns an existing Nextcloud instance into a Fediverse server, giving every user a @[email protected] identity that people on Mastodon, Pixelfed, PeerTube, GoToSocial and Akkoma can follow, mention and reply to.

read the full social overview →

More in Community & Social

Mastodon ★ 50K maigret ★ 38K glance ★ 37K Lemmy ★ 15K giscus ★ 12K owncast ★ 12K

Related comparisons

mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs glance maigret vs glance mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey mastodon vs core giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs fider giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review

More Social Networking projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Social Networking field.

Bluesky vs Mastodon Bluesky vs maigret Bluesky vs glance Bluesky vs Lemmy Bluesky vs owncast Bluesky vs misskey Bluesky vs core Bluesky vs Pixelfed Bluesky vs Infinity-For-Reddit Bluesky vs writefreely Bluesky vs Reddit-Enhancement-Suite Bluesky vs praw

Frequently asked questions

Is Bluesky or social more popular?

Bluesky has 18,304 GitHub stars and social has 503. Bluesky has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bluesky and social free?

Both are open source. Bluesky is licensed under MIT and social under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bluesky and social?

Bluesky is written in TypeScript and social in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bluesky or social?

Choose Bluesky if you want the larger community (18,304 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose social if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.