head to head · open source

Bluesky vs Smithereen

Bluesky has 18,295 GitHub stars, 2,837 forks, 2,400 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Smithereen has 546 stars, 36 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Bluesky leads on adoption by 3,251% (18,295 vs 546 stars). Bluesky is written in TypeScript under MIT; Smithereen is written in Java under Unlicense. Bluesky has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, Smithereen 7%. Bluesky was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bluesky ★ 18K Smithereen ★ 546 category Community & Social

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bluesky Smithereen
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 546
License MIT Unlicense
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 36
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bluesky if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bluesky profile →

pick Smithereen if

  • You want the Smithereen feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Unlicense license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Smithereen fits your workflow better

full Smithereen profile →

About Bluesky

Bluesky is the open source social application codebase for the Bluesky Social app. It lives in the AT Protocol ecosystem, also called atproto, and it is written in TypeScript as a React Native application. The project provides client code for Web, iOS, and Android, and it builds on open source atproto packages such as @atproto/api, which live in a separate repository.

read the full Bluesky overview →

About Smithereen

Smithereen is a federated, ActivityPub compatible social network server written in Java that gives a self hosted instance friends, walls, and groups, and it is aimed at administrators who want to run their own social space that talks to the wider fediverse rather than renting one from a platform.

read the full Smithereen overview →

More in Community & Social

Mastodon ★ 50K maigret ★ 38K glance ★ 37K Lemmy ★ 15K giscus ★ 12K owncast ★ 12K

Related comparisons

mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs glance maigret vs glance mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey mastodon vs core giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs fider giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review

More Social Networking projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Social Networking field.

Bluesky vs Mastodon Bluesky vs maigret Bluesky vs glance Bluesky vs Lemmy Bluesky vs owncast Bluesky vs misskey Bluesky vs core Bluesky vs Pixelfed Bluesky vs Infinity-For-Reddit Bluesky vs writefreely Bluesky vs Reddit-Enhancement-Suite Bluesky vs praw

Frequently asked questions

Is Bluesky or Smithereen more popular?

Bluesky has 18,295 GitHub stars and Smithereen has 546. Bluesky has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bluesky and Smithereen free?

Both are open source. Bluesky is licensed under MIT and Smithereen under Unlicense. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bluesky and Smithereen?

Bluesky is written in TypeScript and Smithereen in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bluesky or Smithereen?

Choose Bluesky if you want the larger community (18,295 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Smithereen if its feature set, stack or Unlicense licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.