head to head · open source

Bluesky vs SCrawler

Bluesky has 18,295 GitHub stars, 2,837 forks, 2,400 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SCrawler has 2,174 stars, 154 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Bluesky leads on adoption by 742% (18,295 vs 2,174 stars). Bluesky is written in TypeScript under MIT; SCrawler is written in Visual Basic .NET under GPL-3.0. Bluesky has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, SCrawler 7%. Bluesky was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bluesky ★ 18K SCrawler ★ 2.2K category Community & Social

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bluesky SCrawler
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 2.2K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Visual Basic .NET
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-07
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 154
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bluesky if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bluesky profile →

pick SCrawler if

  • You want the SCrawler feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Visual Basic .NET
  • You evaluated both and SCrawler fits your workflow better

full SCrawler profile →

About Bluesky

Bluesky is the open source social application codebase for the Bluesky Social app. It lives in the AT Protocol ecosystem, also called atproto, and it is written in TypeScript as a React Native application. The project provides client code for Web, iOS, and Android, and it builds on open source atproto packages such as @atproto/api, which live in a separate repository.

read the full Bluesky overview →

About SCrawler

SCrawler is a GPL 3.0 licensed, Visual Basic .NET media downloader and crawler that pulls photos and videos from user profiles and feeds across social networks and adult platforms, aimed at individuals who want a local archive of media they already have access to.

read the full SCrawler overview →

More in Community & Social

Mastodon ★ 50K maigret ★ 38K glance ★ 37K Lemmy ★ 15K giscus ★ 12K owncast ★ 12K

Related comparisons

mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs glance maigret vs glance mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey mastodon vs core giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs fider giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review

More Social Networking projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Social Networking field.

Bluesky vs Mastodon Bluesky vs maigret Bluesky vs glance Bluesky vs Lemmy Bluesky vs owncast Bluesky vs misskey Bluesky vs core Bluesky vs Pixelfed Bluesky vs Infinity-For-Reddit Bluesky vs writefreely Bluesky vs Reddit-Enhancement-Suite Bluesky vs praw

Frequently asked questions

Is Bluesky or SCrawler more popular?

Bluesky has 18,295 GitHub stars and SCrawler has 2,174. Bluesky has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bluesky and SCrawler free?

Both are open source. Bluesky is licensed under MIT and SCrawler under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bluesky and SCrawler?

Bluesky is written in TypeScript and SCrawler in Visual Basic .NET. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bluesky or SCrawler?

Choose Bluesky if you want the larger community (18,295 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose SCrawler if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.