head to head · open source

Bluesky vs Maskbook

Bluesky has 18,295 GitHub stars, 2,837 forks, 2,400 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Maskbook has 1,583 stars, 316 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Bluesky leads on adoption by 1,056% (18,295 vs 1,583 stars). Bluesky is written in TypeScript under MIT; Maskbook is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Bluesky has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, Maskbook 20%. Bluesky was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bluesky ★ 18K Maskbook ★ 1.6K category Community & Social

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bluesky Maskbook
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 1.6K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 316
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bluesky if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bluesky profile →

pick Maskbook if

  • You want the Maskbook feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Maskbook fits your workflow better

full Maskbook profile →

About Bluesky

Bluesky is the open source social application codebase for the Bluesky Social app. It lives in the AT Protocol ecosystem, also called atproto, and it is written in TypeScript as a React Native application. The project provides client code for Web, iOS, and Android, and it builds on open source atproto packages such as @atproto/api, which live in a separate repository.

read the full Bluesky overview →

About Maskbook

Maskbook is open source browser extension. It is TypeScript project. It carries AGPL 3.0 license. It sits in Community & Social / Social Networking. It presents itself as portal to new, open Internet. It bridges Web2.0 to Web3.0. It targets social platforms people already use. It adds encrypted posting, encrypted file sharing, NFT profile picture use, token trading on X (formerly Twitter), crypto lucky draws. It uses topics: arweave, blockchain, browser extension, crypto, cryptography, defi, dweb, encryption, ethereum, gundb, ipfs, nft. It has 1582 stars, 316 forks, 4 open issues. Repo age 7 years. Last push 2026…

read the full Maskbook overview →

More in Community & Social

Mastodon ★ 50K maigret ★ 38K glance ★ 37K Lemmy ★ 15K giscus ★ 12K owncast ★ 12K

Related comparisons

mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs glance maigret vs glance mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey mastodon vs core giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs fider giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review

More Social Networking projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Social Networking field.

Bluesky vs Mastodon Bluesky vs maigret Bluesky vs glance Bluesky vs Lemmy Bluesky vs owncast Bluesky vs misskey Bluesky vs core Bluesky vs Pixelfed Bluesky vs Infinity-For-Reddit Bluesky vs writefreely Bluesky vs Reddit-Enhancement-Suite Bluesky vs praw

Frequently asked questions

Is Bluesky or Maskbook more popular?

Bluesky has 18,295 GitHub stars and Maskbook has 1,583. Bluesky has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bluesky and Maskbook free?

Both are open source. Bluesky is licensed under MIT and Maskbook under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bluesky and Maskbook?

Bluesky is written in TypeScript and Maskbook in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bluesky or Maskbook?

Choose Bluesky if you want the larger community (18,295 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Maskbook if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.