head to head · open source

Bluesky vs haven

Bluesky has 18,295 GitHub stars, 2,837 forks, 2,400 open issues and last shipped yesterday. haven has 803 stars, 48 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Bluesky leads on adoption by 2,178% (18,295 vs 803 stars). Bluesky is written in TypeScript under MIT; haven is written in Ruby under MIT. Bluesky has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, haven 6%. haven was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bluesky ★ 18K haven ★ 803 category Community & Social

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bluesky haven
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 803
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Ruby
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 48
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bluesky if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bluesky profile →

pick haven if

  • You want the haven feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and haven fits your workflow better

full haven profile →

About Bluesky

Bluesky is the open source social application codebase for the Bluesky Social app. It lives in the AT Protocol ecosystem, also called atproto, and it is written in TypeScript as a React Native application. The project provides client code for Web, iOS, and Android, and it builds on open source atproto packages such as @atproto/api, which live in a separate repository.

read the full Bluesky overview →

About haven

Haven is a self hostable, MIT licensed private blogging application built with Ruby on Rails, made for people who want to write for a known circle of friends and family rather than publish to the open web.

read the full haven overview →

More in Community & Social

Mastodon ★ 50K maigret ★ 38K glance ★ 37K Lemmy ★ 15K giscus ★ 12K owncast ★ 12K

Related comparisons

mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs glance maigret vs glance mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey mastodon vs core giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs fider giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review

More Social Networking projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Social Networking field.

Bluesky vs Mastodon Bluesky vs maigret Bluesky vs glance Bluesky vs Lemmy Bluesky vs owncast Bluesky vs misskey Bluesky vs core Bluesky vs Pixelfed Bluesky vs Infinity-For-Reddit Bluesky vs writefreely Bluesky vs Reddit-Enhancement-Suite Bluesky vs praw

Frequently asked questions

Is Bluesky or haven more popular?

Bluesky has 18,295 GitHub stars and haven has 803. Bluesky has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bluesky and haven free?

Both are open source. Bluesky is licensed under MIT and haven under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bluesky and haven?

Bluesky is written in TypeScript and haven in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bluesky or haven?

Choose Bluesky if you want the larger community (18,295 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose haven if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.