head to head · open source

Bluesky vs amethyst

Bluesky has 18,295 GitHub stars, 2,837 forks, 2,400 open issues and last shipped yesterday. amethyst has 1,601 stars, 221 forks, 114 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Bluesky leads on adoption by 1,043% (18,295 vs 1,601 stars). Bluesky is written in TypeScript under MIT; amethyst is written in Kotlin under MIT. Bluesky has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, amethyst 14%. amethyst was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Bluesky ★ 18K amethyst ★ 1.6K category Community & Social

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Bluesky amethyst
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 1.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 221
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Bluesky if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Bluesky profile →

pick amethyst if

  • You want the amethyst feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and amethyst fits your workflow better

full amethyst profile →

About Bluesky

Bluesky is the open source social application codebase for the Bluesky Social app. It lives in the AT Protocol ecosystem, also called atproto, and it is written in TypeScript as a React Native application. The project provides client code for Web, iOS, and Android, and it builds on open source atproto packages such as @atproto/api, which live in a separate repository.

read the full Bluesky overview →

About amethyst

Amethyst is Nostr client for Android. Project lives in Nostr social network ecosystem. GitHub description says Nostr client for Android. Topics say android, kotlin, nostr, social network. Category says Community & Social / Social Networking. Homepage is http://amethyst.social. License is MIT. Language is Kotlin. Repository has 1599 stars, 221 forks, 114 open issues. Repository age is 4 years. Last push is 2026 09 15T02:53:19Z. README lists GitHub downloads, Play Store installs, stable release, Quartz Maven Central, Quartz JitPack snapshots, CI, MIT license, DeepWiki.

read the full amethyst overview →

More in Community & Social

Mastodon ★ 50K maigret ★ 38K glance ★ 37K Lemmy ★ 15K giscus ★ 12K owncast ★ 12K

Related comparisons

mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs glance maigret vs glance mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey mastodon vs core giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs fider giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review

More Social Networking projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Social Networking field.

Bluesky vs Mastodon Bluesky vs maigret Bluesky vs glance Bluesky vs Lemmy Bluesky vs owncast Bluesky vs misskey Bluesky vs core Bluesky vs Pixelfed Bluesky vs Infinity-For-Reddit Bluesky vs writefreely Bluesky vs Reddit-Enhancement-Suite Bluesky vs praw

Frequently asked questions

Is Bluesky or amethyst more popular?

Bluesky has 18,295 GitHub stars and amethyst has 1,601. Bluesky has the larger community by that measure.

Are Bluesky and amethyst free?

Both are open source. Bluesky is licensed under MIT and amethyst under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Bluesky and amethyst?

Bluesky is written in TypeScript and amethyst in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Bluesky or amethyst?

Choose Bluesky if you want the larger community (18,295 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose amethyst if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.