head to head · open source
bla vs CyberStrike
bla has 5,706 GitHub stars, 700 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CyberStrike has 3,579 stars, 618 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped yesterday. bla leads on adoption by 59% (5,706 vs 3,579 stars). bla is written in TypeScript under MIT; CyberStrike is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. bla has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, CyberStrike 17%. bla was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| bla | CyberStrike | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.7K | ★ 3.6K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-14 | 2026-11-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 700 | ⑂ 618 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick bla if
- You weight community size — 5.7K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CyberStrike if
- You want the CyberStrike feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and CyberStrike fits your workflow better
About bla
English · 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Türkçe · Русский · Tiếng Việt · ไทย · Deutsch · Español · Français · Українська · Polski · Português (Brasil) · العربية · فارسی · Bahasa Indonesia · Italiano · Ελληνικά · മലയാളം · Roman Urdu · Română BLA: Blind LLM Agents Make reverse engineering bankrupt again. Point BLA at the build you ship. When an AI reverse engineering agent (REA) opens it, the analyzer hits resource budgets, follows decoys, and burns tokens — while your users still get the same runtime behavior. Website · Guides · Showcases · Disclaimer Quick start · Empirical results · Format coverage · Benchmark · FAQ…
About CyberStrike
English 简体中文 繁體中文 한국어 Deutsch Español Français Italiano Dansk 日本語 Polski Русский Bosanski العربية Norsk Português (Brasil) ไทย Türkçe Українська বাংলা Ελληνικά Tiếng Việt हिन्दी The first open source AI agent built for offensive security. Automated penetration testing from your terminal — plug in your Claude, GPT, or any LLM subscription and turn it into an autonomous red team agent with 13+ specialized agents, 7,600+ security skills, and 120+ OWASP test cases. 150+ AI providers • 5,300+ models • 56+ built in tools • 176+ MCP tools Quick Start • Intelligence Layer • What Makes It…
read the full CyberStrike overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is bla or CyberStrike more popular?
bla has 5,706 GitHub stars and CyberStrike has 3,579. bla has the larger community by that measure.
Are bla and CyberStrike free?
Both are open source. bla is licensed under MIT and CyberStrike under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between bla and CyberStrike?
bla is written in TypeScript and CyberStrike in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, bla or CyberStrike?
Choose bla if you want the larger community (5,706 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose CyberStrike if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.