head to head · open source
Agentic-Bug-Hunter vs bla
Agentic-Bug-Hunter has 5,866 GitHub stars, 1,049 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. bla has 5,579 stars, 681 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Agentic-Bug-Hunter leads on adoption by 5% (5,866 vs 5,579 stars). Agentic-Bug-Hunter is written in Python under MIT; bla is written in TypeScript under MIT. Agentic-Bug-Hunter has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, bla 12%. bla was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-security, claude-code, llm-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Agentic-Bug-Hunter | bla | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.9K | ★ 5.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-12 | 2026-11-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 681 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Agentic-Bug-Hunter if
- You weight community size — 5.9K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick bla if
- You want the bla feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and bla fits your workflow better
About Agentic-Bug-Hunter
AI powered bug bounty hunting recon to report, in your terminal. Free Setup · Quick Start · Commands · What It Finds · Install · Support · FAQ Built and maintained by AwareXone · Website · X · GitHub Trusted By Engineers At Where this project's stargazers say they work. Compiled from public GitHub profiles of this repository's stargazers 43 people across 30 organizations, counted from the employer each person lists on their own profile or from their public organization memberships. No individual accounts are named. These companies have not endorsed or sponsored this project; their logos are shown as trademarks…
read the full Agentic-Bug-Hunter overview →
About bla
English · 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Türkçe · Русский · Tiếng Việt · ไทย · Deutsch · Español · Français · Українська · Polski · Português (Brasil) · العربية · فارسی · Bahasa Indonesia · Italiano · Ελληνικά · മലയാളം · Roman Urdu · Română BLA: Blind LLM Agents Make reverse engineering bankrupt again. Point BLA at the build you ship. When an AI reverse engineering agent (REA) opens it, the analyzer hits resource budgets, follows decoys, and burns tokens — while your users still get the same runtime behavior. Website · Guides · Showcases · Disclaimer Quick start · Empirical results · Format coverage · Benchmark · FAQ…
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Agentic-Bug-Hunter or bla more popular?
Agentic-Bug-Hunter has 5,866 GitHub stars and bla has 5,579. Agentic-Bug-Hunter has the larger community by that measure.
Are Agentic-Bug-Hunter and bla free?
Both are open source. Agentic-Bug-Hunter is licensed under MIT and bla under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Agentic-Bug-Hunter and bla?
Agentic-Bug-Hunter is written in Python and bla in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Agentic-Bug-Hunter or bla?
Choose Agentic-Bug-Hunter if you want the larger community (5,866 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose bla if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.