head to head · open source
codex-security vs bla
codex-security has 13,224 GitHub stars, 1,027 forks, 220 open issues and last shipped today. bla has 5,579 stars, 681 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codex-security leads on adoption by 137% (13,224 vs 5,579 stars). codex-security is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; bla is written in TypeScript under MIT. codex-security has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, bla 12%. codex-security was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-security, codex), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| codex-security | bla | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 13K | ★ 5.6K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-14 | 2026-11-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 681 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick codex-security if
- You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick bla if
- You want the bla feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and bla fits your workflow better
About codex-security
Codex Security @openai/codex security is a CLI and TypeScript SDK for defining security policy and finding, validating, and fixing security vulnerabilities in your code. 👉👉 See the Codex Security documentation for full documentation. Some cybersecurity requests and protected findings require approval through Trusted Access for Cyber. To join the program, visit chatgpt.com/cyber. Quick start Requires Node.js 22.13.0 or later and Python 3.10 or later. For CI, set OPENAI API KEY instead of signing in. Generate SECURITY.md Draft repository wide or component scoped SECURITY.md guidance for future scans: The command…
read the full codex-security overview →
About bla
English · 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Türkçe · Русский · Tiếng Việt · ไทย · Deutsch · Español · Français · Українська · Polski · Português (Brasil) · العربية · فارسی · Bahasa Indonesia · Italiano · Ελληνικά · മലയാളം · Roman Urdu · Română BLA: Blind LLM Agents Make reverse engineering bankrupt again. Point BLA at the build you ship. When an AI reverse engineering agent (REA) opens it, the analyzer hits resource budgets, follows decoys, and burns tokens — while your users still get the same runtime behavior. Website · Guides · Showcases · Disclaimer Quick start · Empirical results · Format coverage · Benchmark · FAQ…
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is codex-security or bla more popular?
codex-security has 13,224 GitHub stars and bla has 5,579. codex-security has the larger community by that measure.
Are codex-security and bla free?
Both are open source. codex-security is licensed under Apache-2.0 and bla under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between codex-security and bla?
codex-security is written in TypeScript and bla in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, codex-security or bla?
Choose codex-security if you want the larger community (13,224 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose bla if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.