head to head · open source
bentopdf vs Wraft
bentopdf has 15,578 GitHub stars, 1,339 forks, 156 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Wraft has 165 stars, 31 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. bentopdf leads on adoption by 9,341% (15,578 vs 165 stars). bentopdf is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; Wraft is written in Elixir under AGPL-3.0. bentopdf has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Wraft 19%. bentopdf was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (pdf-generation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| bentopdf | Wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 16K | ★ 165 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Elixir |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-07-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.3K | ⑂ 31 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick bentopdf if
- You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Wraft if
- You want the Wraft feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Elixir
- You evaluated both and Wraft fits your workflow better
About bentopdf
BentoPDF is a JavaScript, browser based PDF toolkit that merges, edits, converts, and processes documents entirely on the client, and it is aimed at individuals and teams who need those document workflows without sending files to a third party service.
read the full bentopdf overview →
About Wraft
Wraft is an open source Document Lifecycle Management platform for teams that need to author, collaborate on, and distribute structured business documents such as official letters and contracts while keeping their content in open markdown and JSON formats.
read the full Wraft overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Document Management & E-Signatures projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Document Management & E-Signatures field.
Frequently asked questions
Is bentopdf or Wraft more popular?
bentopdf has 15,578 GitHub stars and Wraft has 165. bentopdf has the larger community by that measure.
Are bentopdf and Wraft free?
Both are open source. bentopdf is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Wraft under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between bentopdf and Wraft?
bentopdf is written in JavaScript and Wraft in Elixir. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, bentopdf or Wraft?
Choose bentopdf if you want the larger community (15,578 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Wraft if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.