head to head · open source

bentopdf vs printcraft

bentopdf has 15,862 GitHub stars, 1,382 forks, 156 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. printcraft has 2,684 stars, 903 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped today. bentopdf leads on adoption by 491% (15,862 vs 2,684 stars). bentopdf is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; printcraft is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. bentopdf has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, printcraft 34%. printcraft was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 5 topic tags (adobe-acrobat, pdf, pdf-generation, pdf-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

bentopdf ★ 16K printcraft ★ 2.7K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

bentopdf printcraft
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 2.7K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Rust
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 903
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick bentopdf if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full bentopdf profile →

pick printcraft if

  • You want the printcraft feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and printcraft fits your workflow better

full printcraft profile →

About bentopdf

BentoPDF is a JavaScript, browser based PDF toolkit that merges, edits, converts, and processes documents entirely on the client, and it is aimed at individuals and teams who need those document workflows without sending files to a third party service.

read the full bentopdf overview →

About printcraft

PrintCraft is an open source, clean room reimplementation of Adobe Acrobat, written in pure Rust, for anyone who needs to read, organize, combine, split and secure PDFs in a fast native application on macOS, Windows, Linux, FreeBSD or the web.

read the full printcraft overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 61K Twenty ★ 58K Odoo ★ 55K marketingskills ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K

Related comparisons

docuseal vs bentopdf bentopdf vs documenso bentopdf vs papermark bentopdf vs pdfcpu docuseal vs documenso docuseal vs papermark docuseal vs pdfcpu docuseal vs opensign opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Document Management & E-Signatures projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Document Management & E-Signatures field.

bentopdf vs Docuseal bentopdf vs Documenso bentopdf vs Papermark bentopdf vs pdfcpu bentopdf vs OpenSign bentopdf vs Papra bentopdf vs mm-wiki bentopdf vs organize bentopdf vs pdfcraft bentopdf vs community bentopdf vs docspell bentopdf vs PaperKnife

Frequently asked questions

Is bentopdf or printcraft more popular?

bentopdf has 15,862 GitHub stars and printcraft has 2,684. bentopdf has the larger community by that measure.

Are bentopdf and printcraft free?

Both are open source. bentopdf is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and printcraft under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between bentopdf and printcraft?

bentopdf is written in JavaScript and printcraft in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, bentopdf or printcraft?

Choose bentopdf if you want the larger community (15,862 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose printcraft if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.