head to head · open source

bentopdf vs browserytools

bentopdf has 15,578 GitHub stars, 1,339 forks, 156 open issues and last shipped yesterday. browserytools has 689 stars, 79 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. bentopdf leads on adoption by 2,161% (15,578 vs 689 stars). bentopdf is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; browserytools is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. bentopdf has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, browserytools 11%. bentopdf was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (pdf-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

bentopdf ★ 16K browserytools ★ 689 category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

bentopdf browserytools
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 689
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 79
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick bentopdf if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full bentopdf profile →

pick browserytools if

  • You want the browserytools feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and browserytools fits your workflow better

full browserytools profile →

About bentopdf

BentoPDF is a JavaScript, browser based PDF toolkit that merges, edits, converts, and processes documents entirely on the client, and it is aimed at individuals and teams who need those document workflows without sending files to a third party service.

read the full bentopdf overview →

About browserytools

BrowseryTools is a collection of 152 free browser based utilities — image and PDF tools, converters, formatters, calculators, generators, and on device AI tools — built for people who need to process files or text without uploading anything to a server, signing up for an account, or tolerating ads.

read the full browserytools overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

docuseal vs bentopdf bentopdf vs documenso bentopdf vs papermark bentopdf vs pdfcpu docuseal vs documenso docuseal vs papermark docuseal vs pdfcpu docuseal vs opensign plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Document Management & E-Signatures projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Document Management & E-Signatures field.

bentopdf vs Docuseal bentopdf vs Documenso bentopdf vs Papermark bentopdf vs pdfcpu bentopdf vs OpenSign bentopdf vs Papra bentopdf vs mm-wiki bentopdf vs organize bentopdf vs community bentopdf vs docspell bentopdf vs PaperKnife bentopdf vs pdfx

Frequently asked questions

Is bentopdf or browserytools more popular?

bentopdf has 15,578 GitHub stars and browserytools has 689. bentopdf has the larger community by that measure.

Are bentopdf and browserytools free?

Both are open source. bentopdf is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and browserytools under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between bentopdf and browserytools?

bentopdf is written in JavaScript and browserytools in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, bentopdf or browserytools?

Choose bentopdf if you want the larger community (15,578 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose browserytools if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.