head to head · open source

bento vs PDF4QT

bento has 5,599 GitHub stars, 388 forks, 38 open issues and last shipped yesterday. PDF4QT has 1,505 stars, 154 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. bento leads on adoption by 272% (5,599 vs 1,505 stars). bento is written in TypeScript under MIT; PDF4QT is written in C++ under MIT. bento has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, PDF4QT 10%. bento was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

bento ★ 5.6K PDF4QT ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

bento PDF4QT
GitHub stars ★ 5.6K ★ 1.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript C++
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-01
Forks ⑂ 388 ⑂ 154
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick bento if

  • You weight community size — 5.6K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full bento profile →

pick PDF4QT if

  • You want the PDF4QT feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and PDF4QT fits your workflow better

full PDF4QT profile →

About bento

Bento — the office suite that fits in a file This PowerPoint alternative is a single HTML file. A Bento deck carries its own viewer, presenter, and editor inside the document — open it in any browser, edit it, present it, send it. The person you send it to needs nothing: the file is the software. Try it in 10 seconds: open bento.page/slides — that's the entire app, running on a starter deck that doubles as the feature tour. Or grab a designed template from the gallery and make it yours. Download the app: grab the single Bento Slides.bento.html from the GitHub Releases page or straight from bento.page ( 560 KB…

read the full bento overview →

About PDF4QT

PDF4QT (c) Jakub Melka 2018 2026 Mgr.Jakub.Melka@gmail.com This software is consisting of PDF rendering library, and several applications, such as advanced document viewer, command line tool, and document page manipulator application. Software is implementing PDF functionality based on PDF Reference 2.0. It is written and maintained by Jakub Melka. Software works on Microsoft Windows / Linux. Software is provided without any warranty of any kind. Should you find this software beneficial, your support would be greatly appreciated :heart: Sponsor! 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This software is based in part on the work of…

read the full PDF4QT overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Office Suites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Office Suites field.

Frequently asked questions

Is bento or PDF4QT more popular?

bento has 5,599 GitHub stars and PDF4QT has 1,505. bento has the larger community by that measure.

Are bento and PDF4QT free?

Both are open source. bento is licensed under MIT and PDF4QT under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between bento and PDF4QT?

bento is written in TypeScript and PDF4QT in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, bento or PDF4QT?

Choose bento if you want the larger community (5,599 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose PDF4QT if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.