head to head · open source

bento vs KillerPDF

bento has 5,129 GitHub stars, 356 forks, 38 open issues and last shipped yesterday. KillerPDF has 3,879 stars, 307 forks, 38 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. bento leads on adoption by 32% (5,129 vs 3,879 stars). bento is written in TypeScript under MIT; KillerPDF is written in C# under GPL-3.0. bento has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, KillerPDF 8%. bento was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (open-source), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

bento ★ 5.1K KillerPDF ★ 3.9K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

bento KillerPDF
GitHub stars ★ 5.1K ★ 3.9K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript C#
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 356 ⑂ 307
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick bento if

  • You weight community size — 5.1K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full bento profile →

pick KillerPDF if

  • You want the KillerPDF feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and KillerPDF fits your workflow better

full KillerPDF profile →

About bento

Bento is an MIT licensed, local first PowerPoint alternative that ships as a single self contained HTML file, in which the deck carries its own viewer, presenter and editor so that anyone who opens it in a modern browser can edit or present it without installing anything.

read the full bento overview →

About KillerPDF

KillerPDF is a free, open source PDF editor for Windows, built in C under the GPL 3.0 licence, that gives individuals and teams a complete view annotate OCR edit sign workflow without an Adobe subscription and without sending document processing off the machine.

read the full KillerPDF overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs cryptpad n8n vs onlyoffice-docs n8n vs libreoffice n8n vs ironcalc n8n vs collabora-online cryptpad vs onlyoffice-docs cryptpad vs libreoffice cryptpad vs ironcalc openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Office Suites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Office Suites field.

bento vs CryptPad bento vs gspread bento vs ONLYOFFICE Docs bento vs LibreOffice bento vs IronCalc bento vs Collabora Online bento vs yft-design bento vs PDF4QT bento vs ZenConverter

Frequently asked questions

Is bento or KillerPDF more popular?

bento has 5,129 GitHub stars and KillerPDF has 3,879. bento has the larger community by that measure.

Are bento and KillerPDF free?

Both are open source. bento is licensed under MIT and KillerPDF under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between bento and KillerPDF?

bento is written in TypeScript and KillerPDF in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, bento or KillerPDF?

Choose bento if you want the larger community (5,129 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose KillerPDF if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.