head to head · open source
bento vs Pdf_Tools
bento has 5,599 GitHub stars, 388 forks, 38 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Pdf_Tools has 684 stars, 44 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. bento leads on adoption by 719% (5,599 vs 684 stars). bento is written in TypeScript under MIT; Pdf_Tools is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. bento has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Pdf_Tools 6%. bento was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (open-source), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| bento | Pdf_Tools | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.6K | ★ 684 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Kotlin |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 388 | ⑂ 44 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick bento if
- You weight community size — 5.6K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Pdf_Tools if
- You want the Pdf_Tools feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Kotlin
- You evaluated both and Pdf_Tools fits your workflow better
About bento
Bento — the office suite that fits in a file This PowerPoint alternative is a single HTML file. A Bento deck carries its own viewer, presenter, and editor inside the document — open it in any browser, edit it, present it, send it. The person you send it to needs nothing: the file is the software. Try it in 10 seconds: open bento.page/slides — that's the entire app, running on a starter deck that doubles as the feature tour. Or grab a designed template from the gallery and make it yours. Download the app: grab the single Bento Slides.bento.html from the GitHub Releases page or straight from bento.page ( 560 KB…
read the full bento overview →
About Pdf_Tools
PDF Toolkit A privacy first, offline PDF utility for Android 📱 Get it on Android 📥 F Droid Installation & Benefits PDF Toolkit is published on F Droid , the repository of free and open source Android software: 100% Free & Open Source : Built using the fdroid build flavor with 0 proprietary dependencies or trackers. Offline Tesseract OCR Engine : Performs Optical Character Recognition completely on device without Google Play Services or network connections. Reproducible & Verified : Standard F Droid automated builds compiled from source. To Install via F Droid: 1. Download the F Droid Client App. 2. Search for…
read the full Pdf_Tools overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Office Suites projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Office Suites field.
Frequently asked questions
Is bento or Pdf_Tools more popular?
bento has 5,599 GitHub stars and Pdf_Tools has 684. bento has the larger community by that measure.
Are bento and Pdf_Tools free?
Both are open source. bento is licensed under MIT and Pdf_Tools under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between bento and Pdf_Tools?
bento is written in TypeScript and Pdf_Tools in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, bento or Pdf_Tools?
Choose bento if you want the larger community (5,599 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Pdf_Tools if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.