head to head · open source

turborepo vs Bear

turborepo has 31,118 GitHub stars, 2,445 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped today. Bear has 6,493 stars, 369 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. turborepo leads on adoption by 379% (31,118 vs 6,493 stars). turborepo is written in Rust under MIT; Bear is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. turborepo has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Bear 6%. turborepo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (build-tool), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

turborepo ★ 31K Bear ★ 6.5K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

turborepo Bear
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 6.5K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Rust Rust
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 369
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick turborepo if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full turborepo profile →

pick Bear if

  • You want the Bear feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Bear fits your workflow better

full Bear profile →

About turborepo

Turborepo is a build system for JavaScript and TypeScript monorepos, written in Rust and released under the MIT licence, intended for teams that build many packages inside one repository and for the coding agents those teams run against it.

read the full turborepo overview →

About Bear

Bear is a GPL 3.0, Rust based command line tool that produces a compile commands.json compilation database for any C or C++ build by recording the compiler invocations that run during it, and it is aimed at developers, code explorers, and CI jobs whose build systems cannot emit that database on their own.

read the full Bear overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs harness react vs vite supabase vs appwrite kubernetes vs dokku vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

turborepo vs vite turborepo vs webpack turborepo vs Appwrite turborepo vs parcel turborepo vs esbuild turborepo vs Harness turborepo vs Dokku turborepo vs nx turborepo vs NocoBase turborepo vs gradle turborepo vs rspack turborepo vs devbox

Frequently asked questions

Is turborepo or Bear more popular?

turborepo has 31,118 GitHub stars and Bear has 6,493. turborepo has the larger community by that measure.

Are turborepo and Bear free?

Both are open source. turborepo is licensed under MIT and Bear under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between turborepo and Bear?

turborepo is written in Rust and Bear in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, turborepo or Bear?

Choose turborepo if you want the larger community (31,118 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Bear if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.