head to head · open source

Avalonia vs Screenity

Avalonia has 31,518 GitHub stars, 2,826 forks, 1,875 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Screenity has 18,708 stars, 1,521 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Avalonia leads on adoption by 68% (31,518 vs 18,708 stars). Avalonia is written in C# under MIT; Screenity is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. Avalonia has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Screenity 8%. Avalonia was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Avalonia ★ 32K Screenity ★ 19K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Avalonia Screenity
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 19K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in C# JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Avalonia if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Avalonia profile →

pick Screenity if

  • You want the Screenity feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Screenity fits your workflow better

full Screenity profile →

About Avalonia

Avalonia is a cross platform UI framework for .NET, written in C and driven by XAML. It provides a flexible styling system and targets a wide range of platforms, including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android and WebAssembly. The project is mature and production ready, and it is used by companies such as Schneider Electric, Unity, JetBrains and GitHub. It lives in the .NET ecosystem and is distributed through the NuGet package manager.

read the full Avalonia overview →

About Screenity

Screenity is a JavaScript Chrome extension under the GPL 3.0 license that records the screen and supports annotation in the browser. It lives in the Chrome extension ecosystem and is distributed through the Chrome Web Store, while its source code is available on GitHub.

read the full Screenity overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Avalonia vs uBlock Avalonia vs Ladybird Avalonia vs chrome-devtools-mcp Avalonia vs monaco-editor Avalonia vs Zen Browser Avalonia vs servo Avalonia vs serenity Avalonia vs refined-github Avalonia vs slate Avalonia vs webtorrent Avalonia vs fingerprintjs Avalonia vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is Avalonia or Screenity more popular?

Avalonia has 31,518 GitHub stars and Screenity has 18,708. Avalonia has the larger community by that measure.

Are Avalonia and Screenity free?

Both are open source. Avalonia is licensed under MIT and Screenity under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Avalonia and Screenity?

Avalonia is written in C# and Screenity in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Avalonia or Screenity?

Choose Avalonia if you want the larger community (31,518 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Screenity if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.