head to head · open source

Automatisch vs loopx

Automatisch has 13,975 GitHub stars, 1,064 forks, 287 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. loopx has 5,903 stars, 559 forks, 102 open issues and last shipped today. Automatisch leads on adoption by 137% (13,975 vs 5,903 stars). Automatisch is written in JavaScript under a custom or non-standard licence; loopx is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Automatisch has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, loopx 9%. loopx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Automatisch ★ 14K loopx ★ 5.9K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Automatisch loopx
GitHub stars ★ 14K ★ 5.9K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-02-11 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.1K ⑂ 559
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Automatisch if

  • You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Automatisch profile →

pick loopx if

  • You want the loopx feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and loopx fits your workflow better

full loopx profile →

About Automatisch

Automatisch is an open source integration platform for workflow automation, positioned as an alternative to Zapier. It lives in the JavaScript, low code, no code, self hosted, and automation ecosystem, and it is categorized under Productivity & Utilities / Automation. The project lets users connect services such as Twitter and Slack so that business processes can be automated without writing code.

read the full Automatisch overview →

About loopx

LoopX is an open, provider neutral, local first control plane for long horizon AI agents that preserves objectives, gates, todos, evidence, quota, and handoffs across turns for developers and teams running durable, governed work on harnesses such as Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor.

read the full loopx overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

Automatisch vs n8n Automatisch vs ProxmoxVE Automatisch vs ActivePieces Automatisch vs LiveKit Automatisch vs amis Automatisch vs Windmill Automatisch vs Botpress Automatisch vs mitosis Automatisch vs puck Automatisch vs Typebot Automatisch vs cadence Automatisch vs local-deep-research

Frequently asked questions

Is Automatisch or loopx more popular?

Automatisch has 13,975 GitHub stars and loopx has 5,903. Automatisch has the larger community by that measure.

Are Automatisch and loopx free?

Both are open source. Automatisch has no licence declared in this registry, and loopx is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Automatisch and loopx?

Automatisch is written in JavaScript and loopx in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Automatisch or loopx?

Choose Automatisch if you want the larger community (13,975 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose loopx if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.